Maduro’s Essequibo Gamble: A Geostrategic Power Play

Recent Developments:

• Venezuelan President’s Order: Nicolás Maduro has directed state-owned companies to immediately commence oil, gas, and mining exploration and exploitation in the Essequibo region of Guyana, a territory rich in oil and minerals .

• Referendum Outcome: This follows a Venezuelan referendum where sovereignty over Essequibo was claimed. Maduro’s announcement came a day after the electoral authorities announced the approval of questions regarding sovereignty over Essequibo .

Historical Context:

• Origin of Dispute: The dispute dates back to 1841 when Venezuela contested the Schomburgk Line established by the UK, which controlled the mouth of the Orinoco River and adjacent lands including Essequibo .
• Twentieth Century Developments: The issue resurfaced in the 1960s, with Venezuela not recognizing the arrangements established by the Treaty of Washington (1897). Several agreements and arbitration attempts have been made but remain unresolved .
• Resurgence of Dispute: Relations between Venezuela and Guyana softened in the late 20th century but the discovery of oil and gas in the disputed region in the 2000s reignited the dispute .

International Response:

• Regional and International Reactions: The Venezuelan government’s recent actions have caused apprehension among neighboring countries, particularly Brazil, which has begun bilateral talks for possible mediation. Various regional organizations and the United Nations have rejected the referendum and expressed concerns over the intensification of military actions .

Consultative Referendum:

• Electoral Process in Venezuela: The Venezuelan government initiated a massive domestic campaign for a consultative referendum to decide the annexation of Essequibo, raising questions about its legitimacy and the impact on regional stability .

In a significant and controversial move, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has ordered the immediate exploration and exploitation of oil, gas, and minerals in the Essequibo region of Guyana, a territory larger than Greece and rich in natural resources. This decree follows the recent Venezuelan referendum that claimed sovereignty over the Essequibo region, a decision that has reignited long-standing territorial disputes and raised regional tensions .

The Essequibo dispute has colonial roots, dating back to the 19th century when Venezuela contested the Schomburgk Line established by the UK. This line gave the UK control over strategic areas, including the mouth of the Orinoco River and the lands up to the Essequibo River. Dissatisfied with this demarcation, Venezuela appealed for U.S. intervention under the Monroe Doctrine . The dispute continued into the 20th century, with Venezuela not recognizing the arrangements of the Treaty of Washington (1897), leading to several failed agreements and arbitration attempts .

The discovery of oil and gas in the Stabroek Block, which lies within the disputed region, has intensified the dispute in recent years. This has led to a resurgence of the conflict, with both countries claiming sovereignty over the region .

Maduro’s recent directive, following the consultative referendum, marks a bold assertion of Venezuela’s claim over the territory. The referendum involved a massive domestic campaign and raised questions about its legitimacy and the subsequent impact on regional stability. The Venezuelan government’s actions have prompted apprehension among neighboring countries, particularly Brazil, which has initiated bilateral talks with Venezuela for possible mediation .

Regional organizations, including the Caribbean Community (Caricom), the Commonwealth of Nations, and the Organization of American States (OAS), along with the United Nations, have rejected the referendum. They have expressed concerns over the potential escalation of the conflict, which could affect not only Guyana and Venezuela but also the broader South American region .

The Essequibo dispute, despite its historical roots, has gained significant attention only recently, mainly due to the discovery of oil reserves. This development has added a new layer to the conflict, focusing on economic interests and resource clashes. The issue calls for a careful and diplomatic approach that respects the sovereign rights of both nations, with the hope of reaching a peaceful resolution in the future

Conflict History:

The Guayana Esequiba, a 159,500 km² region west of the Essequibo River, is under Guyana’s administration but claimed by Venezuela. This dispute originates from colonial rivalry between Spain and the Netherlands, with the area becoming British territory in 1814. Venezuela, inheriting Spain’s claims post-independence, disputed Britain’s expansion beyond the Essequibo in the 19th century.

In 1895, Venezuela sought U.S. intervention under the Monroe Doctrine, leading to a 1899 arbitration favoring British Guiana, which Venezuela later contested as biased. Post-Guyana’s 1966 independence, Venezuela continued asserting its claim, preferring bilateral negotiations over ICJ mediation.

Rich in resources like oil, gas, and minerals, the region has seen Guyana granting exploration licenses to corporations, inciting Venezuelan protests. Amidst Venezuela’s internal political and economic turmoil, and accusations of human rights abuses and authoritarianism, the dispute’s intensity has increased. The emergence of two Venezuelan governments – Maduro’s administration and Guaidó’s interim presidency – further complicates the situation.

Brazil, historically a mediator, has seen a shift in stance under President Bolsonaro, who aligns with Guaidó and opposes Maduro’s claims over Esequiba. Recent military movements near the Guyana-Venezuela border have raised concerns about potential Venezuelan incursions into Guyana, risking a major regional conflict involving neighboring countries and international actors.

Brazil Stance:

In the context of the escalating territorial dispute between Guyana and Venezuela over the Esequibo region, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s stance reflects a commitment to regional stability and diplomatic resolution. Lula has shown solidarity with Guyana, engaging in discussions with Guyanese President Irfaan Ali on matters including the border controversy and military cooperation. The leaders have agreed to strengthen bilateral relations and coordinate actions against Venezuela’s aggression .

Lula’s approach marks a departure from the confrontational stance of his predecessor, Jair Bolsonaro. While Bolsonaro aligned with the US and other countries recognizing Juan Guaidó as Venezuela’s legitimate president and denounced Nicolás Maduro as a dictator, Lula advocates a more balanced, dialogue-driven strategy. Lula’s government emphasizes respect for international law and the decisions of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) .

Amid rising tensions following Venezuela’s referendum to annex the Esequibo, Brazil has reinforced its military presence along its northern border, a strategic move to ensure security and deter potential escalations. This military buildup includes deploying armored vehicles and additional troops to Roraima state, which borders both Venezuela and Guyana. Brazil’s top diplomat for Latin America and the Caribbean, Gisela Padovan, has stressed the importance of a peaceful resolution and Brazil’s commitment to not allowing its territory to be used for military actions .

In summary, President Lula’s stance on the Guyana-Venezuela dispute is characterized by a commitment to peaceful diplomacy, respect for international law, and a clear departure from the more confrontational policies of his predecessor. This approach is underpinned by a strategic reinforcement of Brazil’s military presence in the border region, signaling a readiness to respond to any developments while advocating for a diplomatic resolution to the longstanding territorial dispute.

]]>